[SomeOtherThrow]

Safari has only weak protections, basically url-level blocking equivalent to Pihole. Last I checked ublock origin does allow blocking elements by DOM selector.

One day ads will start being plexed with content over websockets and the DOM-level protections will be all we have. Firefox is really the only alternative here.

[saagarjha]

> Safari has only weak protections, basically url-level blocking equivalent to Pihole. Last I checked ublock origin does allow blocking elements by DOM selector.

No, Safari content blockers can target selectors as well.

[SomeOtherThrow]

Oh wow, my bad.

Still, I’m not a fan—I don’t trust apple to be a good judge of behavior here.

[roar-of-time]

Yup, the only problem is the limit on the number of filters, which many people think is way too small.

[mgleason_3]

Yup I really wish uBlock origin was available for Safari 13...