|
|
|
|
|
by ssambros
2446 days ago
|
|
"Air Moorea didn’t know it had both types in its fleet, it replaced all its control cables on the interval specified for carbon steel cables — about once a year." Did they just ordered the replacement parts per catalog without looking at what exactly is being installed? I mean, they would have noticed that one plane has a different part number. |
|
Furthermore, even if they had known, it's not clear it would have made a difference:
> Twin Otter cables can be made of carbon steel or stainless steel. These two types of cables are interchangeable on the airplane. Their inspection and replacement programmes are the same although their behaviour is different: carbon steel cables are more sensitive to corrosion, stainless steel to wear.
> The checks required by the manufacturer are based on the number of flying hours performed or on the calendar and not on a number of cycles. This inspection rhythm is well adapted for the phenomenon of corrosion but not for that of wear.
Absent their own experience with the cables ("Several operators had adopted special inspection intervals closer together than those mandated by the manufacturer"), would they have changed anything?
https://www.bea.aero/docspa/2007/f-qi070809.en/pdf/f-qi07080...