Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by reaperducer 2447 days ago
the threshold used was the default

What makes you think that a LEO would change the defaults? They're not computer scientists, they're people who bought a product to perform a specific function.

It's a tool for generating investigative leads

So were photo books, lie detectors, surveillance cameras, and other tools at first. They became a close enough proxy for "guilt" in the eyes of the users for people to automatically be treated as criminals, even if they'd done nothing wrong.

3 comments

Was this the actual product used by law enforcement or just the same software workflow used for a study? Those are entirely different environments and there's no reason to expect the final offering to behave like the academic setup used in a specific report.
I believe that there were multiple defaults, and they intentionally chose the wrong one to make a point. Your quote cropping is embarrassing.

The analogy would be blaming an anchor manufacturer when the "default anchor" for rowboats doesn't hold an oil tanker.

The question is how do you prevent abuse without handicapping investigators too much, since presumably you do want cases to be solved if possible?