[notreall1238123]

Private citizens should have a right to private conversations with one another, regardless of the channel. Why is this so hard to grasp?

[SkyBelow]

But they may say something illegal, and there are enough people who want to make that impossible that they are willing to sacrifice their rights to ensure the laws on illegal information are enforced.

Some people are fundamentally willing to sacrifice rights they don't view as necessary for some temporary gain, and trying to oppose this in any more direct way can result in having one's own moral standing challenged.

[jecxjo]

>they are willing to sacrifice their rights to ensure the laws on illegal information are enforced.

I think you meant to say "sacrifice everyone's rights." This isn't an opt in scenario, it would be your right to privacy being forcibly taken away.