Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mikestew 2453 days ago
The person in the article said he was watering his lawn for $40/month previously. The fact that it jumped to $250 while maintaining his watering habits does not garner much sympathy from me. Were it $250 so that he might hydrate his children and maintain a reasonable standard of living, well that's another thing. But just so your grass doesn't go dormant? Here, water your grass with my tears.

In summary, I think some poor examples were chosen.

1 comments

People's overall quality of life matters, and it's nice to have a lawn...

Also, you realize plant life is an important carbon sink, right? Is watering backyard trees worthy of your spite as well?

>Here, water your grass with my tears.

Perhaps you're on the wrong site, with this sort of attitude.