[uhhhhhhh]

>Again, isn't the consensus that the percentage of white students in elite colleges would go up from something like 66% to 75% if only raw ability were considered? In other words you're getting shafted for being white, in a mostly white country.

Asians are more impacted than this than Caucasians. Claiming its 'raw ability' is also completely false, its developed education and largely based on socio-economics not race.

>Aren't you gaslighting him? It's called kin selection and it doesn't stop at the parents, it expands outwards further and further with no magical border.

Kin selection has nothing to do it. Just because some white people have accomplished things doesn't mean he deserves any credit for any of it.

To assume otherwise is absurd, unscientific and hilariously stupid.

[cobweb1]

> Asians are more impacted than this than Caucasians.

Everyone knows that.

> Claiming its 'raw ability' is also completely false, its developed education and largely based on socio-economics not race.

Oh so now you're saying asians aren't more impacted. Why are you saying that? You can't even stay coherent within a paragraph. Your worldview doesn't have an ounce of consistency to it.

> As a white man born into this world, you haven't earned anything any other person just born into this world doesn't have. Just because some white people have accomplished something doesn't give you claim or credit for that.

> Just because some white people have accomplished things doesn't mean he deserves any credit for any of it.

Careful now. You are free to have your own political ideas but leave some space for biology to do its thing. Right now you're rejecting an organisms right to protect itself against parasites and you're veering into an ideology that takes children away from their parents at birth. This is getting "hilariously stupid", as you so aptly put it.