There's zero useful, actionable content. There's no evidence the authors have any big-project experience of their own, and the bibliography doesn't help make a case for their expertise.
In fact it seems to be academic back-seat driving by a pair of authors who don't understand the difference between reading about a domain and living in it, and are now communicating in platitudes. With cutesy pictures.
"You know you could try to make your abstractions more elegant? How about focussing on the essence? Or seeing how someone else did it?"
Thanks. When our next intern slot turns up, we'll be sure to keep you in mind.
I agree. With no motivating examples these are just platitudes. Or rather, I suppose if I want the motivating examples and cases, I need to buy the book.
"Illuminating the bold ideas and voices that make up the MIT Press's expansive catalog. We publish thought-provoking excerpts, interviews, and original essays written for a general reader but backed by academic rigor."
The footer in the article.... if the voter doesn’t read the article I think it’s plainly obvious that they didn’t bother to open the article with the intent of reading it...
There's zero useful, actionable content. There's no evidence the authors have any big-project experience of their own, and the bibliography doesn't help make a case for their expertise.
https://softwaredesigndecoded.wordpress.com/annotated-biblio...
In fact it seems to be academic back-seat driving by a pair of authors who don't understand the difference between reading about a domain and living in it, and are now communicating in platitudes. With cutesy pictures.
"You know you could try to make your abstractions more elegant? How about focussing on the essence? Or seeing how someone else did it?"
Thanks. When our next intern slot turns up, we'll be sure to keep you in mind.