Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mlyle 2450 days ago
> I find that completely unpersuasive. The courts have just told Amazon that they DON'T HAVE TO PAY for this time.

The headline is a little misleading. The appellate court was letting the case vs. Amazon go to trial under state labor law; the Supreme Court decided not to intervene, so the dispute is still being litigated.

(Previously, the Supreme Court said time being screening doesn't require compensation under Federal law).