|
|
|
|
|
by mlyle
2450 days ago
|
|
> I find that completely unpersuasive. The courts have just told Amazon that they DON'T HAVE TO PAY for this time. The headline is a little misleading. The appellate court was letting the case vs. Amazon go to trial under state labor law; the Supreme Court decided not to intervene, so the dispute is still being litigated. (Previously, the Supreme Court said time being screening doesn't require compensation under Federal law). |
|