Yes, Rumsfeld did make this speech on the day before the attacks. It's actually a great speech too! He talks about the cumulative bureaucratic waste of the previous few years of the Department of Defense, and poor auditing.
But the section of the Pentagon that was hit was not the "accounting wing". There is (and was) no "accounting wing".
The specific areas that were hit were mostly "Naval Command Center" and "Defense Intelligence Agency", but even then, the area was relatively unoccupied due to renovations that started in 1998.
Forgot to note that, the money wasn't "missing" in the sense that it disappeared. It was definitely spent, over many projects, over many years. The problem he was trying to point out was that the auditing and tracking is poor and it is difficult to retroactively see where it was spent. I'm not trying to downplay it too much, because it obviously was (and IS) a huge problem. But there wasn't any implication of nefariousness or intentional fraud. (Caveat: There may have been smaller cases of fraud to make up that number, but the $2.3trillion itself wasn't implied to be all fraud).
It wasn't "wait, wtf happened to all this money? >:( ".
It was more "ah crap, we didn't do a good job tracking all this money... :*("
The nuance is subtle and easily hand-waved away by truthers, but such is politics.
It wasn't "wait, wtf happened to all this money? >:( ".
It was more "ah crap, we didn't do a good job tracking all this money... :*("
The nuance is subtle and easily hand-waved away by truthers, but such is politics.