|
|
|
|
|
by runako
2454 days ago
|
|
Are these things true of Chicago & Austin as well, or is the the common misconception that "non-coastal" regions means "rural"? In any case, you cite > * Lower incomes > * Less savings in response to an article about a person who is miserable living in a garage. Is it strange to consider that some would rather be "worse" off living in a larger purpose-built dwelling somewhere else? Perhaps they can get paid on an SF pay scale and buy housing in cheaper markets? > * Higher suicide rates SF is literally building a suicide barrier on its iconic bridge. TL;DR; It's okay that people want to live where they want to live. People thrive in different environments. |
|
Chicago is on the longest contiguous coastline in the US; it isn't rural, it's also not non-coastal.