|
|
|
|
|
by Someone
2450 days ago
|
|
”If the warnings don't stop people from doing stupid things, they'll require more warnings or kill the feature” No, they will happily accept the third option: a product that doesn’t require warnings. Cars must have seat belts, ABS, airbags, crumple zones, etc. You can’t buy a chainsaw without kickback reduction, heavy presses are specifically designed so that you need two hands to operate them, etc. etc. There are zillions of cases where we deem warnings insufficient. Why would this feature, that even can injure bystanders, be different? It’s not as if its benefits are so large that they obviously outweigh its risks. |
|