[eesmith]

Creationists say there is actual physical evidence in support of creationism.

Your "test the faith" example for the dinosaurs is at best incomplete. https://www.icr.org/article/how-do-dinosaurs-fit-in/ is an example of a YEC justification which does not use that argument.

My point was to say that your arguments are weak, because they apply equally well to those who defend creationism.

You again write "the global cooling scare of the early '70s is one of these".

As I pointed out, this was primarily a scare in the popular press of the time, while the general consensus in scientific literature was that increased CO2 would lead to global warming.

What you are spreading is, and I quote again, "#7 in the most cited skeptic arguments", and demonstrated to be an invalid argument.