[tjansen]

Thank you for answering the question far better than I could.

Nuclear energy is the conundrum I fail to understand, especially here in Germany. If climate change is the most important threat to humanity, why not choose the relatively easy solution to use nuclear energy, or at least continue to operate the existing plants until there is a better alternative? Or put money into research to overcome the existing shortcomings of nuclear energy. Instead most climate alarmists in Germany want to shut down all nuclear plants and all nuclear research, most prominently the Green party, thereby increasing CO2 emissions. Does that imply that nuclear energy is an even worse threat to humanity? In that case, why don't they focus on fighting nuclear energy first, which is wide-spread especially in neighbouring France.

If you want to fight something, but don't want a solution, that makes me wonder what exactly you're fighting.

[Oletros]

> Thank you for answering the question far better than I could

The OP has not answered what I have asked you and you still have not asked what is a climate alarmist and why you affirm that almost all climate scientists are climate alarmists