Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by the_watcher 2459 days ago
The iPhone was released in 2007, but a smartphone that could technically have called a ride predates it by at least a few years. Uber was founded in 2009, but actually release the product and app until 2011, after a beta in 2010 [0]. It didn't hit a $1B valuation until somewhere between February 2012 and August 2013 [1]. So 4 years until the emergence of the X in "smartphones led to X", 6 years until it was clear that X was a $1B opportunity, so unless you're completely aware of every product spawned by Alexa or voice assistants generally, I don't think this is a fair comparison.

Even saying that, Alexa and competitors don't need to be computing platforms, they just need to be the interaction layer for day-to-day human-computer interaction. Even if Alexa were as technically simple as an IFFTT recipe with the "THIS" being "what the person says out loud", that's hugely valuable. It's very clear to me that if it's easier to do something with on device than without that device, and even easier to make a device do a thing without physically touching the device, that will ultimately be the way most people do the thing, provided they have access to the technology.

That is why Amazon is pumping out so many different Alexa form factors. I couldn't figure out who would want the Alexa ring. Then I met someone who hates ear buds and swears by his Swiss watch who was excited about a wearable he'd use. Amazon wants to be the dominant player, and is simply crossing form factors off of their (presumably) stack ranked by opportunity size list.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uber#History

[1] https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/uber-by-the-numbers-a-ti...

1 comments

> The iPhone was released in 2007, but a smartphone that could technically have called a ride predates it by at least a few years.

From a technical perspective, there's no reason you couldn't have had a ride-hailing app on a Nokia Series 60 phone in 2006, or a Palm Treo 270 in 2002. All the necessary components were present in both of them. What was missing was a critical mass of users of those devices -- a user base large enough for third parties to justify building services on that scale for them.

Which could help explain why Amazon is pumping out Alexa devices in so many different form factors; they haven't cracked the nut yet on a single form factor that will attract that critical mass of users, but maybe if you can aggregate enough small user bases together they'll add up to a large enough one to attract third parties.

Yes, I completely agree with that. Particularly given that "voice assistant who helps you rely less on your smartphone OS" doesn't have the built in distribution advantage that phones did (pretty much everyone had accepted that they need a mobile phone), so a diverse set of form factors matters (not everyone wants glasses, some people hate watches, etc).