[codefreq]

It does not open.

[shakna]

20,450ms TTFB for me. Which is extremely long.

However the demonstrations are great, and some of the programs are inherently computationally expensive, so its sort of expected.

[mjaniczek]

I believe all the programs do only clientside computations, so I wouldn't expect the TTFB to be long because of them.

[css]

26.79s for the document and 29.90s for the stylesheet (123kb and 9.7kb, respectively) in series for me. Took over 60s for all the content to load.

[vanderZwan]

I'm wondering what is causing the congestion - it's not exactly a lot of data

[laumars]

Probably just volume of traffic rather than the size of the assets. Not everyone's personal site is hosted on auto-scaling could services et al. So often you'll see stuff get "hugged to death" (as it's affectionately known) just due to the site's own popularity.

[pinko]

This seems like something that would be perfect in a Jupyter Notebook or the like.

[sundayedition]

My God, It Never Loads

Edit: it did finally load. Its an interesting article and worth the wait, I thought

[GrumpyNl]

takes a while, worth the wait.

[bit-player]

Author here. Thanks for waiting.

It's 5,000 words and 2,000 lines of javascript, plus a few fair-size images, which may explain the long TTFB. But most of the delay is not bandwidth limits but PHP and SQL. The site runs on a creaky WordPress implementation. Someday I'll fix that, if I live so long.