[queercode]

How about "eat no meat regardless of nutritional value (unless absolutely necessary) because it's unethical to do so"?

[Sohcahtoa82]

There is nothing unethical about eating meat.

Now, the factory farming methods you see and the treatment of the animals being raised for meat, is definitely unethical.

[mijamo]

Unethical for whom? It's not like ethics is universal.

[queercode]

I'd say unethical for everyone.

This isn't even just an "animal rights" debate. It's also a debate about the impact that eating meat has on the environment.

There's way too many "eat less meat" articles to list, but here's one: https://time.com/5648082/un-climate-report-less-meat/

Sure, it's a bit of a jump from "eat less meat" to "eat no meat", but the trend is there.

[odessacubbage]

how about instead of eat less meat, eat less shitty meat and cook more? in all likelihood, you'll save money and feel better.

[F-0X]

Because it is not objectively unethical.

[queercode]

Nothing is "objectively unethical". That doesn't mean conversations about ethics can't and don't take place.