|
|
|
|
|
by xvector
2457 days ago
|
|
> the sender of the ad was clearly identified people could judge for themselves. If they aware enough of how horrible their government is that they can ignore what it says and assume it's all a lie, sure. If the Chinese government has done anything to make citizens trust its authority, such as censorship etc, then the ad is manipulative. > While the ad was propaganda it wasn't manipulative or underhanded. Perhaps not in itself, but taking the very example you give, it is manipulative. Use news stories to paint the "official" picture and use astroturfing to provide a counterpart to the "official" picture. Both as parts in a larger underhanded play. |
|