|
|
|
|
|
|
by pcwalton
2454 days ago
|
|
|
For what it's worth, LLVM would have made precise moving GC hard. (Though Go 6g/8g still doesn't have moving GC, which is unfortunate.) For that reason, I'm not certain that LLVM would have been the best decision in the long term, though it would have made Go code faster in the short term. In my view, if Cranelift had been around when Go was announced, it would have been the clear best choice over LLVM, due to compile times and relative simplicity allowing for easy modifications to add things like precise moving GC and moving stacks. |
|
|
Too bad cranelift is written in a language which wasn't even invented when Go was announced ^^.