|
|
|
|
|
by cameronbrown
2461 days ago
|
|
> example, how easy is it for average consumers to avoid websites that use tracking cookies to follow them around the web? The reason nothing has been done is because the majority are uninformed or just don't care. I'd argue we still get the better end of the deal with free as in beer content. > Moreover, it is more efficient for businesses to have one consistent set of rules to follow, rather than a patchwork of 28 contradictory rules, and it is harder for large corporations to pressure countries if those countries are acting together as a bloc. What do you personally think is better? A huge institution with power to regulate the markets of 28 nations, or 28 independent nations? It's not about money. I think it's too much power concentrated into a single body. Would you prefer a business-first approach for anything else? > EU protected free speech Not allowing parody and remix is also an attack on my free speech. |
|