[BAReF00t]

Why do we need bookmarks when we have softlinks. They are the same concept, and an OS that makes a distinction, is a faulty OS, IMHO.

Ditto for tabs. The task bar already serves that. It't the task bar's flaw if it isn't hierarchic.

And actually, a directory already solves that too. Which even exists on Linux. (/proc) All you need, is a (filtered?) horizontal directory tree listing for the tasks/tabs and a sidebar with another directory that you can put softlink URL into.

Add a bit of window manager placement automation, and you got your browser.

And with JS, as a former pioneer web developer: A website whose HTML relies on a certain way of being presented or a certain interactive logic, is a defective website, full stop. The whole point of HTML, is that it is semantic markup, and semantic ONLY! E.g. an audio browser must work just as fine with a website. If one’s website fails at that, it’s because of disinfomatiom spread by the What(TF)WG and because of incompetence, and the causing people must be fired.

[alpaca128]

For me there's a sweet spot for software where you get something that's lightweight and configurable but still comes with features that are considered essential. Browsers without tabs or bookmarks don't tick the last box, something like qutebrowser does. In other words, I dislike bloat but I don't hate it to a degree where I'm willing to switch to something more limited just because it has fewer lines of code.

And JS may not be necessary and I wish that it would be used much less(if at all). But JS won't go away for some time and I still want to be able to use most websites. So I run a browser that supports JS and block everything I find too annoying.