|
|
|
|
|
by raverbashing
2449 days ago
|
|
Well, you're absolutely right, but the law did go from a complete shitstorm to something more manageable. > Maybe the rights of publishers not to have their content seen by users? Well, it was always their right (as they could use robots.txt) but now Google gives them a more fine grained control over it. Though to be honest I'm very, very happy they're trowing a fit right now. Yes, please, use the panel and take your content off of Google. > But certainly the freedom and right of a news consumer in France was harmed as they have less access to news in a convenient fashion. True. But they can always go to the website of their favourite news org and go from there. |
|
Does it? I am pretty sure Google already provided on page directives that gives sites full control of image indexing, snippet usage and even snippet length. [0]
The differences is that now all news sites are opted-out by default, a legal agreement is required to opt in, and the force of law ensures compliance.
I don't really see how this actually does ANYTHING to help anyone except lawyers. I guess it makes it harder for small aggregators to get going...but is that really a result we wanted?
[0] https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93710