|
|
|
|
|
by xienze
2452 days ago
|
|
> And the actual point is that no, they don't, they were cleared away because their existence is a pox on everyone. You’re telling me checks don’t exist in the EU anymore? Forgive me for being skeptical. > where the sender pays the fee to their institution and the receiver pays the fee to theirs, free and open competition has driven the price of sending and receiving money to 0€.) You’re gonna have to elaborate, because that sounds like both parties pay money to perform an exchange, which is even worse than what we have, where one party does. Are you saying that if I wanted to pay someone $100 I have to cough up an additional $5 and the receiving party has to pay $5 to get their $100? In what way is that “no fees” unless the receiving party is reimbursing the paying party directly? Unless I’m missing something here, a transfer of $100 cost $110 under this system. |
|
You pay the fee to your banking organization, which is 0€. The receiver pays the fee to their banking organization, which is also 0€.
Or in other words, there are no fees.
The idea being that the EU has made it very easy to switch banks, and forced a regime where a customer can freely pick the bank that has the lowest fees, which lead to a situation where no bank that wants to retain customers can bill them for transferring money.