Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bediger4000 2456 days ago
The article said that the retraction was covered by 4 outlets.
1 comments

Boy how common and sad that is. Sensational findings on the front page. Correction saying sensational finding totally wrong buried on page ten or not published at all.
Which furthers the "fake news" narrative because now even more people can point out the BS on the front page.

Why don't reporters get angry about this and demand more and better retractions? This hurts their credibility more than anyone.