Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by blaincate 2457 days ago
Hitchhikers guide to galaxy : (I remembered something along this lines)

https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/92738/what-is-the-...

    [Ford] slowly drew out from the wallet a single and insanely exciting piece of plastic that was nestling amongst a bunch of receipts.

    It wasn’t insanely exciting to look at. It was rather dull in fact. It was smaller and a little thicker than a credit card and semi-transparent. If you held it up to the light you could see a lot of holographically encoded information and images buried pseudo-inches deep beneath its surface.

    It was an Ident-i-Eeze, and was a very naughty and silly thing for Harl to have lying around in his wallet, though it was perfectly understandable. There were so many different ways in which you were required to provide absolute proof of your identity these days that life could easily become extremely tiresome just from that factor alone, never mind the deeper existential problems of trying to function as a coherent consciousness in an epistemologically ambiguous physical universe. Just look at cash point machines, for instance. Queues of people standing around waiting to have their fingerprints read, their retinas scanned, bits of skin scraped from the nape of the neck and undergoing instant (or nearly instant - a good six or seven seconds in tedious reality) genetic analysis, then having to answer trick questions about members of their family they didn’t even remember they had, and about their recorded preferences for tablecloth colours. And that was just to get a bit of spare cash for the weekend. If you were trying to raise a loan for a jetcar, sign a missile treaty or pay an entire restaurant bill things could get really trying.

    Hence the Ident-i-Eeze. This encoded every single piece of information about you, your body and your life into one all-purpose machine-readable card that you could then carry around in your wallet, and therefore represented technology’s greatest triumph to date over both itself and plain common sense.
2 comments

Repost with readable formatting:

> [Ford] slowly drew out from the wallet a single and insanely exciting piece of plastic that was nestling amongst a bunch of receipts.

> It wasn’t insanely exciting to look at. It was rather dull in fact. It was smaller and a little thicker than a credit card and semi-transparent. If you held it up to the light you could see a lot of holographically encoded information and images buried pseudo-inches deep beneath its surface.

> It was an Ident-i-Eeze, and was a very naughty and silly thing for Harl to have lying around in his wallet, though it was perfectly understandable. There were so many different ways in which you were required to provide absolute proof of your identity these days that life could easily become extremely tiresome just from that factor alone, never mind the deeper existential problems of trying to function as a coherent consciousness in an epistemologically ambiguous physical universe. Just look at cash point machines, for instance. Queues of people standing around waiting to have their fingerprints read, their retinas scanned, bits of skin scraped from the nape of the neck and undergoing instant (or nearly instant - a good six or seven seconds in tedious reality) genetic analysis, then having to answer trick questions about members of their family they didn’t even remember they had, and about their recorded preferences for tablecloth colours. And that was just to get a bit of spare cash for the weekend. If you were trying to raise a loan for a jetcar, sign a missile treaty or pay an entire restaurant bill things could get really trying.

> Hence the Ident-i-Eeze. This encoded every single piece of information about you, your body and your life into one all-purpose machine-readable card that you could then carry around in your wallet, and therefore represented technology’s greatest triumph to date over both itself and plain common sense.

Please don't use code blocks for quoting large chunks of text - makes it impossoble to read.
Is there a better way to blockquote? HN doesn't have anything like Markdown's '>' for quotes/blockquotes.
> Is there a better way to blockquote?

Personally, I just stick the > in front even though HN doesn't apply special formatting to it. Most people are familiar with that convention, either from Markdown or from stuff like emails.

you can also do "asterisk greater-than text asterisk"

> like this

Same here. If quoting from more than one source, I've sometimes put an identifier in front of the >, like this:

knuth:> blah blah blah

wirth:> bläh bläh bläh

The point of pretty quote formatting is to highlight distinction between your own and borrowed text. But in this case the quote is the main content of the message, so there is no need to format it.

The modern convention for such quotations is called "copypasta": you put your quote in the beginning of your message without additional formatting, and attribute it to the author in the end of your message or in the reply to yourself, or ever in the username of account you created to post the quote (such account would be called "novelty account" because THGTTG is in fact a novel).

Attribution after the quote has additional benefit of giving people the pleasure to recognize the source of the quote themself while they read it.

I've never seen that definition of copypasta before. I've only seen it used to describe a type of meme, where you repost text across the internet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copypasta

No formatting at all is better than 100s of characters in a preformatted block.
> Is there a better way to blockquote? HN doesn't have anything like Markdown's '>' for quotes/blockquotes.

Yes, there’s a better way. Please refer to the parent comment in this discussion [1].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21020162

Your keyboard has quotation marks on it. Why not use them?