|
|
|
|
|
|
by paulddraper
2453 days ago
|
|
|
> and am again out $1000, but this time as a result of my bank's incompetence > If the onus for verifying your identity were on institutions Your two situations are really the same situation. 1. You give your money to another party, and then claim they committed fraud. You can't just instantly seize $1000 from them; you must prove that they committed fraud. 2. You give your money to another party to manage, and then claim they breached contract. You can't just instantly seize $1000 from them; you must prove they violated the contract. In both cases, the legal onus is on the accuser to demonstrate criminal activity ("innocent until proven guilty"). Otherwise, you could walk around claiming people and banks owe you money and simply be presumed correct. (Also, in both cases, it would be have been better for you to not to trust those particular parties.) |
|
|