[rowanG077]

Because of something called justice? It was really ridiculous how he was treated while he didn't do anything wrong. Uninformed masses will still see this guy as a bad person for years to come for no other reason that the media is lying to them.

[PaulRobinson]

He has done lots wrong over many years to many people. The incident that caused the furor was the last straw because it was tone-deaf to the context.

Nobody wishes him ill, but he has no place as a leader in the free software movement if it is to flourish. Of course, he can participate, and as president of GNU that might be an OK level of participation.

Do not expect us to believe he has been treated unfairly, however: he has been treated the same way any other employee at MIT would be treated, and as the FSF has seen fit given its organisational goals.

[diffeomorphism]

> He has done lots wrong over many years to many people.

[citation needed] and distraction. So what if he didn't do anything of what he is currently accused of, I am sure he has done lots of wrong before (of which I am going to list exactly nothing)?

> he has been treated the same way any other employee at MIT would be treated.

He has resigned to shield MIT from public pressure after lots of lies have appeared about things he hasn't said.

[ta0987]

Nobody wishes him ill

I mean... it's plainly obvious given what happened that plenty of people do.

[rowanG077]

What has he done wrong over the years? I keep seeing people say this in this thread without any reference or anything concrete.

[mikeash]

There are millions of more pressing injustices going on right now. The people attacking him didn’t do anything wrong either so who cares at all?

[rowanG077]

This is false dichotomy. The media spend incredible amount of energy destroying this guy for no apparent reason. It's not more then fair the same amount of energy is spend helping him for the injustice that was done.

Beside it's not like the media is lacking in energy to spend on inciting social justice mobs.

[mikeash]

I don’t think it’s a false dichotomy at all. This same community discusses other things, far worse things, and we can compare them. When this community discusses victims of harassment who get fired for reporting it, there isn’t nearly this much time and energy spent on it. When an article about a drone strike blowing up an Afghan wedding made the front page recently, there wasn’t this much outrage. Uber covers up actual crimes and the discussion degenerates into arguments about whether there’s any duty to report crimes to the police. People get fired all the time for far smaller infractions and everybody just shrugs.

Why does this community care so much about what happens to this asshole?

[rowanG077]

This asshole? Without "this asshole" the world would look vastly different today. This guy isn't even an asshole as far as I can see.

It is a false dichotomy, you are pretending that defending the injustice done to Stallman somehow takes away focus from other injustices which is not at all apparent.

The community cares so much about him because he has done significant amounts for the good of humanity. Some people blown up by a drone strike aren't known at all by the community and haven't proven themselves to be invaluable. It's the same reason that you would be sad when a person close to you dies and yet you don't feel the same way when some African kid starves.

People indeed get fired for smaller infractions but those people haven't even closely created as much value as Stallman.

[mikeash]

You seem to be saying that it’s not really about “justice” at all, but rather that it’s purely about defending people who have done a lot of visibly valuable things. Did I get that right?

[rowanG077]

No. You didn't get that right at all. You asked why people are defending him and I gave you an explanation. The comparison I made with the african kid was specifically made to clue you in on it but it seems it went over your head.