|
|
|
|
|
by hibbelig
2454 days ago
|
|
I think the confusion comes because you have to do ln -s bar foo
so that "ls -l" then prints foo -> bar
People who look at an existing symlink before trying to create a new one will get confused.Of course, the solution is to remember that ln is in the same family as cp and mv; ls is a different family. |
|