[_ptgt]

I think a big part of it is that most (recent) mainland expats still mostly consume mainland (i.e. censored) news media and social media, and their friends in their destination country are almost exclusively other mainland expats. Reading and writing Chinese is significantly more comfortable for most expats and mainland Chinese media has cultural appeal for them as well for obvious reasons.

It takes an unusual and frankly relatively rare amount of independent thought and personal research to believe something at odds with a reality that your entire social network accepts as obvious fact. Especially when you start from the same manufactured reality that they did. And I would guess, even among expats, speaking about such doubts of the official CCP line probably is met with significant resistance among other mainlanders as mainlanders tend to be relatively nationalistic (as a product of their censored media and “patriotic education“). Why bother with it then? Which is also a part of contemporary Chinese cultural (no doubt nurtured by the CCP) — politics are is the business of the government, not the governed anyway.

So, in short, there’s a lot of political inertia for mainland expats, not a lot of incentive to consider other views, disincentive to adopt other views, and a lot of work to learn about other views anyway (must be in English in non-work hours, learning a whole alternate history and political philosophy takes a ton of time, your network of Western friends with sufficient knowledge to discuss these topics with is probably amounts to zero). So really, it would almost be more surprising if they were flipping views — even though, personally, I’ve spent significant time learning the CCP canon and find it rather obviously holey.

[michaelbrave]

This isn't the same but related, for many of us that have left religions, the inertia it took was immense. It manifested for me something that looked like 5 years of depression. But afterwards I had lost my network of friends, family, and invalidated a lot of my experiences about how the world worked.

I imagine leaving a cultural and national identity way of thinking would have similar repercussions. Many would lose family relationships, friendships, professional networks and could potentially burn bridges with their home country in such a way as to essentially be in exile. All of that for something they aren't even sure is more true than what they know or could be biased in another way (as most of history is more of a cultural collective of things composed of selected facts in such a way as to paint a narrative or map of what happened).

I still think it's wrong, and I'm not sure how to solve it, but I can kind of understand why someone wouldn't follow their curiosity down the first steps toward an open mind.

[js2]

> It takes an unusual and frankly relatively rare amount of independent thought and personal research to believe something at odds with a reality that your entire social network accepts as obvious fact.

Let that be a lesson to us all.

[guai888]

I would like to point out that, Taiwanese people paid a heavy price to break KMT's stranglehold on Taiwan. The price that we paid is the blood of the innocent. Let me give you an example: One of the democrative movement leader Lin Yi-hsiung's mother and daughter were killed under suspicious circumstance while he was imprisoned. The KMT authority said it was a robbery went wrong and the killer was never caught. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lin_Yi-hsiung. There were many cases like that under KMT's martial law rule. People in China will also has to pay blood price in order to break free of CCP. We have already hearing story that CCP is assassinating people in Hong Kong right now to put down current unrest in Hong Kong. Please remember, authoritarian regimes kill. The lucky one like Jamal Khashoggi got killed without torture. The unlucky one like Lin Yi-hsiung has to live with the pain that his mother and daughters died because of him.

[60325throw]

> Please remember, authoritarian regimes kill.

Exactly. Heck, even non authoritarian regimes will drone strike people if they get in their way.