Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by echelon 2451 days ago
I'm a huge privacy advocate, but I don't think DNA should be private. DNA database tech is a game changer and I absolutely support it being used to solve crimes.

* DNA is immutable, comparable, heritable, and searchable in a tree. It's an ideal lookup key. Unlike fingerprints or face data you don't even need direct DNA evidence. A relative will do.

* It doesn't invade privacy to look this up in a database. No homes were entered into, no phone conversations were tapped. Private lives weren't snooped. No relatives were harmed.

* If you commit a violent crime, bad on you. If you leave DNA behind, you're stupid. The first deserves punishment; taken together doubly so.

* DNA evidence alone may not be enough to convict, but it can be the basis for an investigation.

* We already use video footage and artist sketches. Right now we rely on the "database" of collective human consciousness to find matches, which is unreliable and imperfect. When matches are found it's simply luck or chance -- cases shouldn't have to depend upon that when it's the same class of evidentiary data.

I'd be in favor of the government having all of our DNA on file so long as it isn't used for discriminatory purposes (health insurance, job, organ transplant denial, ...) or for advertising to us.

We're only scratching the surface of what's possible, though. Imagine when we extract higher dimensional features, such as gender, race, hair color, and ultimately facial structure from the DNA. Feed that into a photo database...

Your phenotype and genotype != your private life. Even if we aren't happy with what we got, these are the most concrete representations of our own selves. It's our code and (usually) unique addressing label, independent of any database. We should view it as such.

You're shedding DNA right now through exfoliation, waste elimination, and breathing. You can almost be guaranteed that corporate interests will start tapping into these sources in the next few decades. The law enforcement use case at least seems legitimate.

I just don't want them reading my email. :)

3 comments

>If you commit a violent crime, bad on you. If you leave DNA behind, you're stupid. The first deserves punishment; taken together doubly so.

You aren't more deserving of punishment for being stupid. What kind of insane moral system do you follow?

>You're shedding DNA right now through exfoliation,

And I'd prefer that law enforcement not be able to track me everywhere I go because the risk of getting caught up in an investigation is too high.

The criminal justice system has serious flaws and I'd rather not be wrongly implicated just because I happened to shed DNA near where a crime happened.

> You aren't more deserving of punishment for being stupid.

I was being tongue in cheek. Punishments should fit crimes and those accused should not be judged on the basis of intelligence, race, wealth, or any other factor but the facts of their case. That said, it's easy to prosecute cases with abundant evidence available. Such crimes tend not to be premeditated, and easy convictions serve as social reenforcement to deter similar crimes.

> The criminal justice system has serious flaws and I'd rather not be wrongly implicated just because I happened to shed DNA near where a crime happened.

Fair point.

DNA should be used to place persons at crime scenes and not be used in absence of additional evidence. Unless said DNA was found on the victim of a sex crime, under fingernails, etc.

> DNA is immutable,

Well, no, it's absolutely not. Nor is it necessarily consistent within an individual.

Yes, once you get into the particulars of molecular biology you're correct.

I made a comment about V(D)J recombination just the other day:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21053657

There's barr bodies, chimerism, all kinds of mutation - missense, nonsense, point deletes, repeats -, there's somatic recombination, slipping of strands, transposomes, polyploidy... you name it.

But I think talking at this level ignores the science and overwhelming statistics of SNP databases. You're not going to move around within the database over time.