[MauiWarrior]

I only glanced through it, but there is no github link.

[currymj]

it's conventional to leave these out to preserve anonymity during the peer review process; if one is available, it will be added in the final published version if it's accepted.

this article is still unpublished and was only submitted for peer review yesterday!

[intuitionist]

I also like papers with code, but linking an author’s github in a blind conference submission wouldn’t make a ton of sense.

[MauiWarrior]

What does blind submission mean?

[nicwilson]

In this case the review is, mostly (chances are the area chair knows who is who), double blind meaning: the reviewers don't know who the paper is written by _and_ the authors of the paper don't know the identity of the reviewers.

[psychoslave]

Well, if reviewers want to know, they most likely will be able to make a good guess, without even using any social engineering trick.

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2018/07/identifying_p...