|
|
|
|
|
by ergothus
2460 days ago
|
|
> They've had 3 years to act. Why 2 more weeks is so critical isn't actually all that obvious in the big picture. When you dont have agreement on what to do and a deadline is looming, it seems obvious that, however much it should NOT have been needed, it is in fact critical. You arent chopping 5 weeks off of a 3 year period, you're chopping 5 weeks off of an 8 week period. |
|
This is really about playing politics against Johnson and the government, not an actual outrage. Of course the government was doing the same by prorogating.