[andrerm]

The day a journalist loses free speech is the day a reader loses it too. So the value is the same for both.

[diffeomorphism]

I am not sure I understand the point you are trying to make. Both losing it at the same time does not say anything about the value?

Devil's advocate: The journalist loses his job and livelihood. I had nothing to say anyways. Clearly to him it had much more value.

I obviously agree that free speech is valuable for everyone (and so is free software), but how do you best explain why?