|
|
|
|
|
by probably_wrong
2460 days ago
|
|
Leaving aside the reasons mentioned above about why being anonymous is really important, there's another reason: money. I think it is wildly accepted that major social networks are full of ghost and/or inactive accounts. If companies cracked down on those, everyone would see that their numbers are not accurate and their valuation would take a big hit. Some CEOs would lose their jobs for sure. So it is not in the big networks' self-interest to change that. You could make a network from scratch, were identity is baked in from the start. But who would sign up? If Google+ thought us anything it's that people really hate giving their real names (and rightfully so, IMHO). Sure, some services managed it, but they are not as influential as the big ones. So no new service has the network effects to pull it off, no big network wants to lose money on doing it, and users don't want it. |
|