|
|
|
|
|
by losteric
2465 days ago
|
|
And this is the canonical example of why Twitter gets it wrong :) I'm not talking about myself. Never even remotely implied it. HN is filled with the 0.1% that truly are experts on individual topics. You'll find people that wrote papers on quantum mechanics chiming in on QM discussions, people with decades of RF HW experience correcting those 5Ghz conspiracies, start-up founders jumping in on discussions, and (in this case) people that can read spec sheets and understand how systems like these are built and programmed. No one's an expert on much, but plenty are experts on something. Twitter's often too shallow to even entertain the possibility of being wrong. |
|