|
|
|
|
|
by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC
2457 days ago
|
|
> Economics 101 says just the opposite, that you create inefficiencies when you don’t specialize. That's simply bullshit. If you specialize on only installing tires on cars, but not removing them, you have specialized more than a business that swaps your tires, but you have created massive inefficiency by requiring your customers to somehow move around vehicles without tires for you to install tires for them. There are particular circumstances where specialization increases efficiency, and there are (obviously) other circumstances where specialization decreases efficiency, so it's nonsensical to just say that specializing is always the more efficient choice, which is why all your analogies fail: You use an example where specialization (arguably) increases efficiency, then you completely fail to explain how computer skills fall into the same category as that example, and then you conclude that therefore it is in the same category. |
|
Every specialization is about knowing the level of integration and specialization.