|
|
|
|
|
by benologist
2459 days ago
|
|
I think the takeaway is companies should compete on ethics but be transparent about it. If corporations openly call out each other's malignant actions that's a huge win for us all in holding them to a higher standard. I don't believe the "poor Amazon" angle for a moment though. A lot of the "campaign" against Amazon takes place in EU courtrooms where no rival company is focusing our attention on their transgressions. A lot of stuff Amazon chooses to do is morally unjust and should be illegal - they choose to include bathroom break time with productivity calculations that determines who gets fired. Bezoz just clawed back 1900 workers' healthcare to indistinguishably enrich himself. France fined them for abusing vendors - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/04/france-fines-ama... EU is investigating them to see if they abuse vendors with the vendors' own sales data - https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/19/eu-probing-amazons-use-of-da... Reversing corrupt tax deals - https://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTalk/amazon-apple-tax-... |
|
It seems unlikely that competitors have no influence on what the EU chooses to pursue in courts.