|
|
|
|
|
by NLips
2471 days ago
|
|
I believe the parent isn't disagreeing with you. Breaking down the parent's post: """
What's funny about this is that I think this is a legitimate and relatively non-evil use case.
"""
- parent is saying that fingerprinting so the advertisers know who saw the ads is legitimate and relatively non-evil. It all comes down to lack of transparency/oversight and the option to exercise control as an individual.
"""
- parent acknowledges that not telling the user and not making it configurable can be problematic. |
|