Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
lkitching
2473 days ago
I don't think this is true, do notation (see
https://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/haskellch3....
) specifically depends on the Monad typeclass and exists as syntactic sugar for monadic operators:
> A do expression provides a more conventional syntax for monadic programming