|
|
|
|
|
by 2rsf
2472 days ago
|
|
Take a step back and answer why do you need a bonus system ? Dan Ariely and other Psychology and Behavioral Economists claim that the value of bonuses is not big or even negative [0]. My experience is that bonuses tied to performance leads to a bad work environment, and if at all benefits only part of the people- the backstabbers or the geniuses
[0] https://www.wired.co.uk/article/dan-ariely-bonuses-boost-act... |
|
Examples of the "work tasks" in the studies are: adding numbers and tapping a key as fast as possible. You can probably imagine quite well that it's very easy to hit your maximum performance in these tasks and you can't do much to exceed it no matter what the reward. It seems a bit simplistic to use these studies to claim that bonuses can't increase quality.
The article also completely disregards that bonuses can be used to improve principal-agent alignment, and probably many other factors that are apparent in the more complex, real world that exists beyond tapping a key as fast as possible.