|
|
|
|
|
by UIZealot
2470 days ago
|
|
An attempt to deemphasize Cantonese in Guangdong does not constitute eradication. Mandarin in Hong Kong as far as I know would've been strictly in addition to, not instead of Cantonese, much like learning English in Quebec. So again, not assimilation. > Mao destroyed a lot of cultural relics during the Cultural Revolution. The relics may have been destroyed, but (most of) the people lived, some still living. Culture doesn't die with the relics, it lives with the people. > Things that used to be wide spread such as idol worshiping is no longer seen in China It's certainly less wide spread now, especially in big cities. But it's still common in small towns and villages. Dive deeper next time you visit China. |
|
I would have to disagree with this. Those people are in their 70s now. And without relics, there is no anchor for cultural values.
Cambodia did the same thing and it has been a disaster to their culture.
The destruction of the relics was on purpose. Hence “cultural” revolution.
> its stated goal was to preserve 'true' Communist ideology in the country by purging remnants of capitalist and traditional elements from Chinese society, and to re-impose Mao Zedong Thought as the dominant ideology within the Party
It was a deliberate attack on Chinese culture to solidify Maos power.
Your statement sounds too much like marketing speak without any substance. I think I heard it before. Oh yeah: Thor Ragnorak. It is low effort.