|
|
|
|
|
by icarus_drowning
5634 days ago
|
|
Isn't the "closed" vs. "open" status of Flash a total red herring? Flash is a browser plugin that any browser maker can choose to support or not to support. Google is arguing that a specified standard should use something more "open". In other words, I have a hard time seeing how bundling a plugin and not supporting a proprietary codec that is vying to be part of a new standard is hypocritical at all. And that above all seems to be the most important part of Gruber's "argument". edit: minor grammatical correction |
|