[onezerozeroone]

And as might be expected on a forum full of intelligent nitpickers, people can parse and dissect the structure of this sentence to fit any narrative they'd like.

For example, it says it's solving issues attributed to production of livestock...it doesn't outright claim the "meat" itself is healthier for you in terms of nutritional content.

Drive by any factory farm that stretches for hundreds of acres and the stench alone would convince you that reducing things like that would have a positive impact on human health, both directly and indirectly [runoff of feces and chemicals into the environment, use of antibiotics and hormones, climate change, etc]

[kgwgk]

It also says it that page:

  WHY BUILD MEAT DIRECTLY FROM PLANTS?

  PLANT-BASED MEATS:
  IMPROVING HUMAN HEALTH

  ANIMAL-BASED MEATS:
  16% INCREASED CANCER RISK
  21% INCREASED HEART DISEASE RISK

  1. “Risks associated with processed meats.” Archives of Internal Medicine.