Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by slavik81 2467 days ago
Can't copy-on-write achieve the same thing? If you keep a reference count, you can know whether it's safe to mutate the underlying data, or whether you need to make a copy first.
1 comments

Technically copy-on-write is an implementation detail.

It may or may not be implemented this way.

I mean that CoW classes like Qt's QStringList do the same data sharing without being immutable.
Admittedly, it's pretty easy to accidentally make unnecessary non-const accesses in modern C++. An immutable API would certainly avoid a lot of qAsConst casts.