Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by saagarjha 2471 days ago
Unfortunately I am trying to wrap const to something that wasn’t designed this way: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20948523
1 comments

Since soft const constraint is not part of the type, perhaps you could pass it to a lambda function that treats it as a const and another lambda function that treats it as mutable. A sort of const region and mutable region.