|
|
|
|
|
by cthalupa
2475 days ago
|
|
In a lot of ways, living on spaceships/space stations/other artificial constructions is likely a better path forward than looking to colonize new planets in general. O'Neill cylinders are quite practical, and with advances in technology that seem likely to occur, even larger projects like Bishop rings should be doable. They can be linked together to form constellations, and have enough free floating resources within the solar system to be able to build enough of them to support populations in the trillions. It probably sounds less than ideal to you and me, vs. living on a planet, but it probably wouldn't be so bad to someone born in that sort of environment and is used to it. With that in mind, I don't know if it makes sense to try and find human habitable planets, vs. just places with lots of raw material we can use. Unless there's alien life we want to go meet up with, at any rate. |
|
Yeah, and also at some point, it won't matter what's ideal or not.. it'll be about survival.