[aidos]

I feel of all the arguments against hooks, the whole “order of hooks” thing is the thinnest. You just learn about it and then it’s not a problem again.

I definitely get that there are some more complex cases where you have to jump through a couple of useRef hoops to do what you need. On balance though, I think the way the behaviour becomes declarative is worth the trade off.

[ssalka]

Coming from the FP world, hooks are a terror because they break all the nice rules functions are supposed to uphold. Hook components don't necessarily return the same value when given the same arguments, making them impure (stateful). The benefit of function components IMO has always been that you can use the function scope as a container for pure, stateless rendering logic. With the introduction of hooks I can no longer ensure that.

[aidos]

Nothing stops you from using pure function components, and you should where possible. But eventually, you need to hold state somewhere. You don't need to put it in your components, but you do need to deal with it. If anything, hooks are a nice middle ground where the behaviour becomes declarative.

[ssalka]

My personal opinion is that state should be contained in some sort of class or data structure, separate from functional architectures where the notion of state is generally avoided. So my usual suggestion would be to use either a class component (or redux or insert favorite state mgmt solution here) for your state, and then inject the state as props to your function components

[cercatrova]

That's fine, you can use React's Context API and reducers just like Redux, for which the useContext and useReducer hooks exist. Then it's just like Redux, inject a Provider and Consumer and you're good to go.

[PKop]

How does the existence of hooks preclude you from using function components without state (without any hooks)?

[ssalka]

They don't, but before I could look at a function component and go "ah, a nice stateless component" whereas now I have to wonder whether the _function_ contains _state_

[s_y_n_t_a_x]

If you see "useWhatever"... then it has a hook.

And you already have to wonder if a function has state if you didn't write it. If you did, you should know.

[RussianCow]

The issue I have with the "rules of hooks" is that it makes some previously trivial things cumbersome at best, and downright complicated at worst. For a quick example, something as simple as mapping an array onto a series of elements with a callback requires (as far as I can tell) that the inner element be broken out into its own component that calls `useCallback`, since you can't create a unique callback for each item in the parent.

[aidos]

You don't need to use hooks there. You can just define your functions and be done with it.

[RussianCow]

You do if you don't want those child components to be re-rendered needlessly when some higher-level state changes.

[tracker1]

I don't quite get the obsession with the order of hooks... You call all the hooks in your component function and don't optionally do so. In the end, if you're optionally calling different hooks differently in the same component, you're probably doing something wrong, and/or they should be separate components.

[wilsonrocks]

I've found that the hoop jumping type stuff, while potently annoying, can at least be abstracted into a custom hook (and then mocked in tests) easily so that the code is clean.