|
|
|
|
|
by ofibrvev
2481 days ago
|
|
This is bullshit. Why would any interview process filter out the factors that lead to screwing around, working on other things, or just burnout? They won’t and they can’t, as these are dynamic factors. Also I’m curious as to why you think a white board interview of all things is the deciding factor in at even minimizing this behavior. A plausible reason why these behaviors are less common at google and Facebook etc is that they are paying much closer to “efficiency wages”.. if you’re working at the typical tech or Corp company you’re probably making shit pay, and why wouldn’t you study to get something better.. Google pays much better than average and is already top resume signaling, there’s just much less incentive to screw around. Googles process is still not fantastic at filtering for general critical thinking. Irony: the person referred to in the story may very well ended up at Google. I know this possibility first hand. I worked for a shit shop nearby a Google office. My own fucking manager did whiteboard practice and ended up at google a few months later. |
|