|
|
|
|
|
|
by bshipp
2481 days ago
|
|
|
One situation that makes a great deal of sense on paper and is very difficult to effectively implement on commercial scales is aquaponics. In theory, being able to produce both fish and vegetables should be a good value proposition. In reality, instead of trying to balance two biological systems (hydroponic plants and integrated pest management biocontrols) you now have to balance 4: plants, insects, fish, and algae/bacteria. Suddenly the farmers potential for very costly cascade failures increases exponentially. If your algae dies, your plants die. If you fish die, your algae dies. If any of your solutions to dying fish/algae/insects impacts another biological system the whole farm collapses and you need to sterilize and start over. And yet, so many of the people pitching this idea wonder why there is so little commercial interest in pursuing such an integrated system. |
|
|
Aquaponics is an infinitely better system as it can be truly organic. It has to be tackled entirely differently..lots of AI/automation for constant monitoring and systems control.
Major expense in traditional Ag is labour. This can be optimized and minimized with indoor Ag.
As an outdoor farmer, the control of variable factors in indoor systems is appealing to me but I can also see how being risk averse is better. Small indoor farms are better than the broad acre mind set we have with outdoor Ag. Taking everything indoor except fruit and grains and fiber and spices etc is very attractive to me. But a new supply chain and control of markets has to be in place.
I am not even worried about energy long term as we would go nuclear at some point eventually. Impending climate change should require us be mindful of alternative Ag systems. I am particularly interested in saline agriculture. I think it would be useful research.