|
|
|
|
|
by Fnoord
2476 days ago
|
|
Agreed w/your post in general. > On one hand, Bitwarden's online offering where you trust them with your data is convenient, but also a single point of failure. Put your network connectivity off, and try to relogin to Bitwarden. It will work. I just tried it. The only downside is that the database might not be synced (which, I admit, can be a problem). > The only caveat with self-hosting being the overhead. Regular non-techie people just don't have the time or intellectual curiosity to experiment with self-hosting. I don't know the password to connect to my (hypothetical) self-hosted Bitwarden instance. Because of the above though, that would not be an issue. Hence I am going to switch to self-hosting. There's a Rust implementation with Docker image. |
|
That's correct, but the parent comment is also correct about the single point of failure. The Bitwarden server could erase your database for some reason (bug, hackā¦), and it would sync on all your devices, erasing all your data.