Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by safeplanet-fesa 2484 days ago
I strongly believe that calling medications by their brand name is a bad idea. It's marketing departments' work to put into peoples' heads their stupid and annoying brand names. They want people to seek %brand_name% rather than %chemical_name%. They want people not even to know actual names of the chemicals. It's so widespread that people start thinking that medications called by their brand names are more effective than their generics. Companies that produce and sell generics have to write on the packages "compares to the active ingredient of %brand_name%™" otherwise people will not buy it. People don't know what diphenhydramine is, they only know B......l, and it's the only antihistamine they know. For that reason, when two exactly same medications are located at the counter right next to each other, one plain small adequately-looking box with a generic, and another one is a colorful oversized stupidly-named box with words "ultra", "fast", "extra", that easily costs 3 times more, people go for the later. Don't propagate this practice.
1 comments

This seems to be a uniquely American problem. I’m a Brit who now lives in the USA, but back in the UK, calling things by their generic drug name was the default, and while brand names were also still common, there was usually more than one to choose from.

Aside: It took me far too long to figure out that “paracetamol” is called “acetaminophen” in the USA. You would think that at least the generic names would be universal.

Technically, the true generic name is para-acetylaminophenol, from which both paracetamol and acetaminophen are derived (and Tylenol, for that matter). That nobody ever calls it para-acetylaminophenol (and that I needed to copy/paste that because I can neither spell nor pronounce it) is a good indication why brand names are preferred over chemical names.
Pharmacists and doctors just write it APAP. Way shorter and unambiguous. Likewise aspirin is ASA.
.."APAP" is brand name too.
I'm still trying to convince my wife, who's French, they are the same thing. She's convinced the medicines in France are stronger.
My girlfriend is French, and they sort of are I suppose.

Their over the counter paracetamol are usually 1000mg per tablet whereas ours are limited to 500mg per tablet.

In an average dose, thy only take one, whereas we take two.

Yikes. Twice as easy to destroy your liver by accident with 1000mg tablets.
I know that in the UK painkillers that contain codeine as an additive are common, which makes them stronger. I don’t believe it’s possible to get it in the USA.

To make up for it, it’s very difficult to buy painkillers in the UK in quantities of more than about 8, while Costco sells jars of literally hundreds of tablets.

US person here: I am familiar with codeine-(acetaminophen) mix everyone calls "Tylenol-3". It requires a prescription.
In the UK you can buy 16 tablets of paracetamol off the shelf. You can buy 32 tablets over the counter. You can have a discussion with a pharmacist if you want to buy more - up to about 100.

This is a useful suicide prevention measure and we've seen deaths by suicide from paracetamol reducing a bit as a result.

You are correct, any acetaminophen with codeine would require a prescription. Careful what you carry in your luggage. :^\
I think it’s common in many countries, including the UK. Take Calpol for example, parents will rarely ask for a bottle of oral paracetamol solution
...but that most people in the UK call it “Panadol”